|
Francis Sheehan wrote:
There
are several problems with the above "reform".
The
most significant objection is it leaves PUBLIC access television totally
in control of incumbent-candidates who can dictate cable operation, to the
detriment of others. The LWV-sponsored Greenburgh Campaign Reform
Commission's December 2000 recommendations, which you have not acted
upon, overcome the incumbent-dominated cable access problem. The
recommendations need to be implemented if you really want to be fair to
all. You helped set up the commission and are now ignoring its
recommendations. That's not good -- for you or the town.
Second,
you do not define the amount of "available air time".
Hastings-on-Hudson has a nearly 24/7 system. We have a 4 hour
/ 5 day system. There is NO reason why we cannot have a 24/7 cable
system, unless you want to continue to limit what can be shown. Dividing
up the existing time, giving each producer a few minutes, is, frankly,
ridiculous. If "hundreds want to produce a show", as you
state, the amount of time allotted weekly on channel 73 would be: 100
producers = 12 minutes each; 200 producers = 6 minutes each. The
time allotted on channel 71 would be significantly less since municipal
meetings take up many of the time slots.
Other
unanswered questions include:
>> Why wait until December 15th to register?
>> How much studio time will be available to the 100's of producers?
What hours will the studio be open?
>> Will residents be able to fully control production/editing of
their shows, as is common in other municipalities?
>> Will weekends be used for airing/taping programs? (We know
weekend programming is possible.)
>> Alfreda Williams, the town clerk, told the Greenburgh Campaign
Finance Commission that she previews submitted tapes for content to ensure
they are appropriate to air. What standards are used? Who set
the standards? Are they written?
>> Will shows produced outside the town be allowed on our town's
public access channels (cutting the limited number of slots available to
Greenburgh residents)? If so, is preference given to a resident who
actually produces a local show over a resident who sponsors a show
produced outside the town?
>> When will registered programs actually begin airing?
>> What impartial entity decides time slots?
>> What impartial entity decides replay frequency?
>> What impartial entity handles complaints?
I
fully understand cable access principles and our system's capabilities.
The above limited "reform" you recommend will not reduce
the controversy regarding the town's infringement of residents'
first-amendment rights by controlling their access to public access
television. Please consider comprehensive reform, such as the
recommendations made by the Greenburgh Campaign Reform Commission. Thank
you.
--Francis
Sheehan |