|

Home GfG 3-28-08 GfG 9-16-07 GfG 11-3-06 GfG 10-18-06 GfG 9-25-06 GfG 9-24-06 GfG 9-21-06 GfG 9-20-06 GfG 8-18-06 GfG 8-15-06 GfG 8-4-06 GfG 5-30-06 G'burgh Town Board 5-9-06 GfG 5-3-06 GfG 4-4-06 GfG 3-20-06 GfG 1-17-06 Greenawalt 9-10-05 GfG 8-19-05 ECC-GCA 8-8-05 GfG 5-27-05 Greenawalt 5-23-05 GfG 5-11-05 GfG 3-11-05 GfG 10-22-04 GfG 10-14-04 GfG 9-7-01 GfG 6-30-00 GfG 6-20-00 GCFC 6-5-00 State of NY 5-1-00 GfG 12-1-99 GfG 11-4-99 GfG 10-12-99 GfG 10-11-99 GfG 9-1-99 NECA 8-25-99 GfG 8-16-99 Sheehan 7-13-99 Sheehan 6-4-99 Town Attorney 6-3-99 Sheehan 6-3-99 SHCA 5-24-99 Sheehan 5-21-99 MPC 5-18-99 GfG 4-14-99 GfG 3-26-99 ZBA 3-26-99 SHCA 3-23-99 GfG 3-10-99 SHCA 3-09-99 SHCA 3-08-99
| |
SECOR HOMES CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC. (SHCA)
P.O. Box 550, Ardsley, New York 10502
SHCA SITE TOUR WITH GREENBURGH TOWN BOARD
March 23, 1999
SHCA members conducted a site tour of three problem spots in
the Secor Homes area with Town Board Members and the Town Supervisor, Paul Feiner.
Accompanying the Town Supervisor were Town Board Members Les Adler, Eddie Mae Barnes,
Diana Juettner and Timmy Weinberg. This site tour grew out of a meeting SHCA members had
with several Board members in the home of a SHCA member earlier in the month.
The following Fact Sheets on Jennifer Lane, the
Westchester View Lane buffer (behind Jean Lane) and WFAS were distributed to
the Town Board and SHCA members.
FACT SHEET/WFAS Site
- In 1944, WFAS was permitted to operate a local broadcast station as a
public service even though the site was zoned for residential use.
- In 1985, the present 450-ft. guy-wired tower was erected to replace
the original freestanding tower; the legality of the replacement is in question.
- In 1989, WFAS applied to the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) for
permission to operate a two-way radio system. The ZBA denied the application.
- Notwithstanding the 1989 ZBA denial, WFAS began expanding its
non-conforming use in this residentially-zoned neighborhood by allowing commercial users
to lease space on the tower, and even allowed the antennas denied by the Zoning Board to
be erected immediately after the denial was issued.
- SHCA representatives noted the illegal activity in the 1989 ZBA
transcript and yet nothing was done about the additional commercial antennas.
- There are now 21 antennas on the property; many of which are illegal.
- Unbelievably, the building inspector has recently determined
that 17 antennas are legal because they pertain to the WFAS broadcasting service; he now
maintains WFAS can expand its operation as much as it wants without variances; the
SHCA has filed an appeal of the building inspector's decision to the Zoning Board of
Appeals.
- Residents are concerned that the WFAS site will become the center of
the telecommunications industry in Greenburgh and negatively affect our safety and
property values.
- Residents are particularly concerned about safety issues:
- A structural analysis done by Nextel/WFAS indicates that the tension
on the guy wires significantly exceeds industry standards.
- The structural analysis also showed that only one of the turnbuckles
anchoring the guy wires has been properly threaded. (This hazardous condition has
obviously existed since the tower was erected in 1985 and proves that WFAS does not have
an effective safety inspection program.)
- A large chunk of ice fell through a bedroom window of a home on Essex
Place due to ice build-up during storms. (The new tower is 75 feet closer to homes on
Vista and some homes on Essex Place.)
- Arcing from the guy wires onto the dry grass below has resulted in
the fire department responding to residents' calls. (Sparking of the wires occurs when a
lightning storm is imminent.)
- 17 homes directly abut the WFAS property. The 450 foot tower is so
close to residential uses there is no "safe" fall zone for the tower.
- If one of the guy wires snaps (and we know all but one is/has been
improperly threaded to the anchors and there is corrosion) the steel cable will slice
through any house or car it hits and kill any person it hits.
FACT SHEET/Westchester View Lane Buffer
- In 1987 the Towns Planning Board established a buffer
area for the homes along Jean Lane. The buffer is a 50-ft. area running along the
southerly and southeasterly boundaries of Westchester View Lane.
No saplings or large bushes may be removed by the
developer along this buffer to better shield the existing and new homes from the Ferncliff
buildings.
- Buffers by their very nature exist in perpetuity
- Now 12 years later the Town is attempting to obliterate the
buffer area by saying that it does not survive the development stage.
- Position on its face is patently ridiculous
- First the Town Engineer, who used to work for the developer as
the site engineer, issued an edict that the buffer area is not protected and does not
exist in perpetuity---that is, an owner can violate the buffer.
- After press coverage of the Town Engineers conflict of
interest, the Town finally removed him from decisions on the area, but not before two
sections of the buffer area had been decimated.
- Now the Planning Board Commissioner and the Town Attorney,
with the apparent support of the Town Supervisor, is maintaining the same position.
- Buffer areas and the enforcement of their protection are
critical to the quality of life in Greenburgh.
- If developers are allowed to disregard Planning Board and
Zoning Board conditions, and Town officials support them, the very process and legitimacy
of government is undermined.
- When Town officials repeatedly assure homeowners that Planning
Board conditions will be enforced, and then the Town officials renege on those assurances,
the Towns enforcement process becomes a shambles.
FACT SHEET/Jennifer Lane
- Residents on Jennifer Lane became aware of a increasing amount
of business being conducted at the end of Jennifer Lane about the beginning of February.
- Since then heavy-duty construction equipment were observed
carrying on a fine soil business on residential-zoned property. A sign on Dobbs Ferry Road
announces the fine soil business.
- Police were called and responded twice in February when the
construction equipment was operating on Sunday, very early in the morning. (Feb. 21, 99)
- Another example that developers and commercial interests do
not feel compelled to observe Town law.
[ Previous Page ] [ Home ] [ Up ] [ Next Page ]
|